I know this is an old thread, but I do think it would be great if we could rank catalogs. Perhaps if the user could just mark them high/low. My main use case would be bookmarks/history as well.
d On Friday, September 24, 2010 5:26:39 AM UTC-7, Rob McBroom wrote: > > On Sep 23, 2010, at 8:23 PM, Philosopher Dog wrote: > > > I've got 1700 delicious bookmarks and other folders indexed. Is there > > some way to tell QS to rank my applications above these other matches > > without having to do it one by one. > > No, I don't believe there's a way to rank types, just individual items. I > will say that the automatic ranking that happens as you use Quicksilver > works pretty well, but that takes time. > > One way to target a specific type is to use it's catalog entry. (In your > Catalog prefs, make sure “Quicksilver Catalog Entries” is selected.) You > should be able to search for “Applications (Catalog)” in the first pane, > then select the “Search Contents” action. This will give you a blank > Quicksilver interface and whatever you search for will now be limited to > Applications. (It'll go back to normal the next time you invoke > Quicksilver.) > > If you want to do this often, you could create a trigger for it. I have > triggers that take me straight to a search for Artists and one for Remote > Hosts. > > -- > Rob McBroom > <http://www.skurfer.com/> > > -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Quicksilver" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/blacktree-quicksilver?hl=en. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.
