Speaking as a fellow user, 1.61803, when I read your posts asking why this or that crazy, hackish way to accomplish something doesn't work, I begin to understand why larger companies train their tech support people to give the canned response: "Using [whatever goofy hack the customer wants to try] is unsupported."
If you want to figure out some unsupported hack to accomplish a task that already has a normal way to accomplish it, then *you* go figure it out. That's what real hackers do. They don't come rushing to the devs and the community with every little question every time their hacks don't turn out to be WYSIWYG-easy. Rob has better things to do with his time. The rest of us have better things we'd like him to use his time on. On Wednesday, September 11, 2013 1:51:26 PM UTC-4, 1.61803 wrote: > > On Wednesday, September 11, 2013 7:29:44 PM UTC+2, Rob McBroom wrote: >> >> That wasn’t one of the ways I suggested. Maybe it can be made to work, >> maybe not. Here’s what I meant by a custom entry. >> > > I know. When I said that I tried this to no avail I was referring to my > method — as another way, in addition to yours. Any ideas as to how to make > mine work? Why doesn't it index the local url? > -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Quicksilver" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/blacktree-quicksilver. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.
