Nice, that's good to hear. Uhh...y'know, I've been meaning to have a look 
at the QS source for a loooong time now. I don't think I have time at the 
moment, but maybe someday...

On Thursday, April 10, 2014 9:00:03 AM UTC-4, Rob McBroom wrote:
>
> On 9 Apr 2014, at 22:18, Daniel wrote:
>
> Honestly I feel like it would ultimately make sense to split the plugin in 
> two, with "Scripting Support" or something being analogous to the "Email 
> Support" plugin, and then the Terminal (and iTerm) plugins only providing 
> the actions and functionality that specifically interact with those 
> applications. It seems in one sense silly to have to have the Terminal 
> plugin installed when I only use iTerm. But that's another story.
>
> It actually does work that way, with QSTerminalMediator handing the work 
> off to either Terminal or iTerm. The difference is that, unlike E-mail 
> Support and Chat Support, the Terminal mediator was never given a dedicated 
> plug-in. It’s included with the Terminal plug-in, which is why the iTerm 
> one requires it.
>
> It *should* eventually be split out, but I can’t say that’s at the top of 
> anyone’s list. Care to take a crack at it? :-)
>
> -- 
> Rob McBroom
> http://www.skurfer.com/
>

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"Quicksilver" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to [email protected].
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/blacktree-quicksilver.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

Reply via email to