> Le 5 août 2016 à 08:19, 1.61803 <[email protected]> a écrit : > > On Thursday, August 4, 2016 at 2:32:19 PM UTC+2, Rob McBroom wrote: > The closest you could get right now (I think) is to run an AppleScript that > returns something. But of course you’d need the extra step of running the > script to get the result before you could use an action on it. > > That's exactly what I want to avoid. The question was, would it be feasible > feature request? I mean, it's just wrapper, isn't it? And then the return > value would be automatically parsed as QS objects.
IMHO, no, unless you want to expose yourself to the world of pain that is AppleScript when you try to interface with it from Obj-C/anything else really. I mean, unless someone with the experience with how to write applescript generic "descriptors" that can accurately represent what's an "object", you will have no "automatically parsed as QS objects" — unless you do the kludge we had do for custom actions, which is ask the script what type of data it want and provide that directly. And I have no experience with AS (trust me I've tried), so I'm not even sure that QS internal architecture is compatible with the AS expectation of "application > documents > objects" — not without heavy changes. Regards, Etienne Samson -- [email protected] -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Quicksilver" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. Visit this group at https://groups.google.com/group/blacktree-quicksilver. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
