M.Canales.es wrote these words on 04/12/05 12:29 CST: > El Martes, 12 de Abril de 2005 03:08, Randy McMurchy escribi�: > > >>I'm not an XML expert, so I'm probably wrong. There's just not many >>places in the book where a screen tag is wrapped in a para tag, >>though. > > > Actually, if that is an example but not what must be typed by the user, a > proper taging, semantically spoken, could be <literallayout> (maybe adding > <code>) or, if the grey backgroung is wanted, <screen><literal>.
Two things here: I removed the [para] tags wrapping the [screen] tags because of what the BLFS Editor's Guide says: "screen -- This creates a 'verbatim' environment that allows spacing to be controlled. Mainly used as it simulates a console. It should not be encapsulated by [para] unless unscreened text is present." Another point I was trying to make is that the [userinput] tag was used as there is stuff in the section that is input by the user. However, looking at the Editor's Guide, [userinput] is used mainly to encapsulate [command] tags. But there are many, many places where [userinput] is used to simply indicate text entered by the user, not necessarily just commands. -- Randy rmlscsi: [GNU ld version 2.15.94.0.2 20041220] [gcc (GCC) 3.4.3] [GNU C Library stable release version 2.3.4] [Linux 2.6.10 i686] 12:41:00 up 10 days, 12:14, 3 users, load average: 0.00, 0.04, 0.05 -- http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/blfs-book FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/blfs/faq.html Unsubscribe: See the above information page
