El Jueves, 28 de Abril de 2005 21:24, Bruce Dubbs escribiÃ: > OK. Generally I don't update the changelog for typos, minor changes, or > formatting, but that's really the decision of each editor.
OK. > Don't be too concerned about indentation in the xml when it doesn't > affect the output. There can be *minor* variations to enhance some > readability issues. The overall concern here is that the xml is > maintainable. The indentation is done allmost automatically in my end, except the screen sections and other minor issues that I have to fix manually. When the file is actually well indented, many text/XML editors respect and follow automatically that indentation, and the avanced ones can catch tags errors while editing. But yes, with the time the indentation could be broken again due the several packages updates without lost anything actually valuable for the book. -- Manuel Canales Esparcia Usuario de LFS nÂ2886: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org LFS en castellano: http://www.escomposlinux.org/lfs-es http://www.lfs-es.com TLDP-ES: http://es.tldp.org -- http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/blfs-book FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/blfs/faq.html Unsubscribe: See the above information page
