Randy McMurchy wrote: > [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote these words on 07/31/05 12:19 CST: > > > >> <para>Probably the easiest way to store mixer levels is to set and >>- retrieve them using a bootscript.</para> >>+ retrieve them using at boot and shutdown. We'll use a bootscript to >>+ store the values at shutdown.</para> > > > This needs to be fixed. Mostly the grammatical error in the first > sentence and it would be nice if the "We" could be changed to "A > bootscript is used to store..." for the occurence of the "We". > > > >>+ <para>We will restore the volume using the stored settings and a >>+ dev.d handler script that will execute when the device is detected >>+ durring boot (when pluged in for USB devices). While still the >>+ <systemitem class="username">root</systemitem> user, create the dev.d >>+ handler script with the following commands:</para> > > > Please s/durring/during/ and s/pluged/plugged/ > > Perhaps something besides the "We" opening the first sentence as well. > > :-) >
You know 'We' never even entered my train of thought last night. I got tired and crashed while waiting for a test render...then commited this morning. Thanks for the catch. Something better will be in place as soon as postfix changes are confirmed. -- DJ Lucas -- http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/blfs-book FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/blfs/faq.html Unsubscribe: See the above information page
