[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote these words on 12/18/05 01:05 CST: > Author: bdubbs > Date: 2005-12-18 00:04:59 -0700 (Sun, 18 Dec 2005) > New Revision: 5444 > > Modified: > trunk/BOOK/introduction/welcome/changelog.xml > trunk/BOOK/xsoft/office/gimp.xml > Log: > Updated gimp to make recommended dependencies and configure command > consistent.
Why is Gimp-Print now recommended for the Gimp package? Isn't this taking the "Recommended" recommendation a bit far? What is wrong with the way it was? Having --disable-print and Gimp-print being Optional seems perfectly sane to me. I think we are taking this a bit far, recommending dependencies because (and I'm guessing here) we think that folks won't read the command explanations and remove the switches if they need to. I think it is excessive and overly-babying the book. -- Randy rmlscsi: [GNU ld version 2.15.94.0.2 20041220] [gcc (GCC) 3.4.3] [GNU C Library stable release version 2.3.4] [Linux 2.6.10 i686] 10:00:00 up 84 days, 19:24, 3 users, load average: 0.00, 0.02, 0.04 -- http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/blfs-book FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/blfs/faq.html Unsubscribe: See the above information page
