Justin R. Knierim wrote these words on 01/25/06 20:21 CST: > The patch name needs the "-1" between fixes and .patch. The ftp repo is > updated. Thanks.
Thanks Justin. I will fix this. What sucks though, Is that I said this not too long ago when there was another patch that was slightly misnamed but was told that it was okay. But that was fiction. It used to be that if a patch didn't exist, or one was in the repo that wasn't called for, there was a message sent to -book stating this. I was told that it was still was the same way. Obviously it is not. Something has changed. Bottom line is that we used to be notified if there were discrepancies, however we are no longer. Bummer. -- Randy rmlscsi: [GNU ld version 2.15.94.0.2 20041220] [gcc (GCC) 3.4.3] [GNU C Library stable release version 2.3.4] [Linux 2.6.10 i686] 21:29:00 up 123 days, 6:53, 3 users, load average: 0.03, 0.23, 0.44 -- http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/blfs-book FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/blfs/faq.html Unsubscribe: See the above information page
