On 3/26/06, Bruce Dubbs <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Dan Nicholson wrote:
> >
> > I don't care if they're in or not. I only looked into because that's
> > the policy. If they're taken out, what should I say? Saying there's
> > no test suite would be a lie.
>
> I took a look at this and all the errors are roundoff errors at the last
> digit.
Yes, I got the same thing. And the same number of errors.
> The only change that needs to be made to the book here is to change the
> sentence: "Some tests are known to fail, but bc is still useable
> [sic]." to read: "There are a very small percentage of tests (10 of
> 12,144) that will indicate a roundoff error at the last digit."
Fixed. Thanks.
> I also note that we have:
>
> for TEST in Test/{checklib,testfn}.b& do
> echo "quit" | ./bc/bc -l $TEST
> done
>
> but testfn.b does nothing. It is merely a function useful for including
> in other tests. We need to change this to:
>
> echo "quit" | ./bc/bc -l Test/checklib.b
I guess I just checked which tests actually reported on number of
passes/failures. Thanks.
Committed in r5753.
--
Dan
--
http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/blfs-book
FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/blfs/faq.html
Unsubscribe: See the above information page
