On 4/4/06, [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > + > +<screen><userinput>sed -i.bak '/CONFIG_H/i #include <linux/types.h>' \ > + hw/xfree86/os-support/linux/lnx_agp.c</userinput></screen>
This is a totally minor nitpick. If anyone feels like it's not important, just say so and we'll move on. However... -i.bak is just to cause the original file to be saved with the extension .bak. This is inconsistent with the rest of all of LFS where the files are altered in place and no back up is made. (Except for early LFS where you can't be certain that sed supports -i) Using the extension is just something I got into the habit of from reading the DIY book, but it doesn't affect the sed at all. For consistency sake, should this go? Or should it stay in the name of teaching through examples? I just don't want anyone thinking that the .bak part has anything to do with how the source is being affected. -- Dan -- http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/blfs-book FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/blfs/faq.html Unsubscribe: See the above information page
