BLFS Trac wrote these words on 04/26/06 00:39 CST: > Changes (by [EMAIL PROTECTED]): > > * keywords: => OpenSSL > * priority: high => normal > * severity: major => normal > * type: defect => task
Upon reflection, I now think that perhaps it was wrong of me to change the priority of a bug. My intentions this evening have been to categorize the task/defect/enhancement stuff, but I've also changed other fields. But thinking about it, after someone accepts a bug, the priority of it should be left to the one then responsible for it, as it may be a tag to assist him with prioritizing it for his purpose, so my apologies. Know that it was done more in haste and little thought, than that is the way I thought it should be. -- Randy rmlscsi: [bogomips 1003.28] [GNU ld version 2.16.1] [gcc (GCC) 4.0.3] [GNU C Library stable release version 2.3.6] [Linux 2.6.14.3 i686] 01:01:01 up 31 days, 12:38, 1 user, load average: 1.94, 0.72, 0.49 -- http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/blfs-book FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/blfs/faq.html Unsubscribe: See the above information page
