DJ Lucas wrote:
The one minor difference that caught my attention was that a specific dependent package was mentioned. We had agreed previously to cover specific deps in the wiki. I'm not sure the note is a problem with the way the rest of the section is written currently, at worst, it should be reworded. However, my other reply moved this to dev for discussion, where I'm suggesting to remove all three like notes.

FWIW, I think information about dependencies should be in the book. It would be a mistake to remove useful information.

Andy
--
http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/blfs-book
FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/blfs/faq.html
Unsubscribe: See the above information page

Reply via email to