BLFS Trac wrote: > #2020: OpenOffice 2.0.3 > ----------------------------------------+----------------------------------- > Reporter: [EMAIL PROTECTED] | Owner: [email protected] > Type: task | Status: new > > Priority: normal | Milestone: 6.2 > > Component: BOOK | Version: SVN > > Severity: normal | Resolution: > > Keywords: | > ----------------------------------------+----------------------------------- > Comment (by [EMAIL PROTECTED]): > > The other change is that the jdk patch needs to be modified. There are a > couple parts of the patch that have now been applied to the source code. > There are a couple more areas, the last 3 or so diffs in that patch, which > no longer apply but I can't really tell if it would be best to leave it > as-is in the source. Those diffs change variable names of "enum" to > "uenum", but the source now uses "enumerate". I've attached an updated jdk > patch with the parts that no longer apply removed. >
Chris, Thanks for the patch. As far as the last three enum patches, it doesn't matter what you call them, just that enum is a reserved word since 1.5.0. I chose uenum for unnamed enum. You can call them goblygook if you want, just so long as the same name is used through the rest of that block of code. Anyway, I'll see if I can get to this later on today or at least before the holiday. For those in the dark, July 4th is a national holiday (Independence Day) in the United States. -- DJ Lucas -- http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/blfs-book FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/blfs/faq.html Unsubscribe: See the above information page
