#2178: Does teTex require the obsolete unicode package?
-----------------------------+----------------------------------------------
Reporter: Arnold the Frog | Owner: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Type: task | Status: assigned
Priority: normal | Milestone: 6.2.0
Component: BOOK | Version: SVN
Severity: normal | Resolution:
Keywords: |
-----------------------------+----------------------------------------------
Comment (by [EMAIL PROTECTED]):
I can go either way. Some TeX installations use
texmf - for files from the original TeX distribution only
texmf-local - for any files added into the system after the original Tex
installation
texmf-local - only for files developed locally.
Again, I don't care either way. I would, however, like to hear why your
preference is the way it is. Is it because that's how Debian does it?
Or because the cm-super fonts are in the texmf structure so the
type1ec.sty file goes there as well.
I'm not questioning you Alexander, I'm trying to learn.
--
Ticket URL: <http://wiki.linuxfromscratch.org/blfs/ticket/2178#comment:8>
BLFS Trac <http://wiki.linuxfromscratch.org/blfs>
Beyond Linux From Scratch
--
http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/blfs-book
FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/blfs/faq.html
Unsubscribe: See the above information page
