On 1/20/07, Bruce Dubbs <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Randy McMurchy wrote: > > > > I do not want to use a CVS version of Enigmail. Can we back out to the > > most recent stable version that works. Otherwise, let's just go back > > to the SeaMonkey that works with a non-CVS version of Enigmail. > > I know. I didn't want to either, but I thought there was a security > issue in 0.94.1. Looking again, I can't find it. Lets hold off > reverting this for a few days and see if the mozdev folks release a > better tarball. I can then use that or revert to 0.94.1 if they don't.
Maintainer says he fixed it now. http://bugzilla.mozdev.org/show_bug.cgi?id=16250 Looks like he rolled a new tarball without changing the name: [ 9:43 AM [EMAIL PROTECTED] md5sum enigmail-0.94.2.tar.gz* cc1ba2bec7c3a2ac408ef24fbf1884de enigmail-0.94.2.tar.gz 74a9c69a59b5c173d790d4b274ff4a96 enigmail-0.94.2.tar.gz.orig I haven't tried building it yet. -- Dan -- http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/blfs-book FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/blfs/faq.html Unsubscribe: See the above information page
