On 6/13/07, Ag. D. Hatzimanikas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Just substitute /required dependency/strongly recommended/ for sasl and be > done > with this (refer to Alexander's answer).
OK, but I don't agree with your patch as is and will change something. I believe you're giving too much attention to smtp authentication. It's really no different than pop or imap. I also checked, and mutt will cache the password for smtp authentication per session. > If you want also to say that, it can be compiled against slang is fine, > although > I've never tried with slang and I don't know if it works as reliable as > it does with ncurses. What I actually wanted to say was "don't use slang since you don't need it". But I'm punting this for now. > Also if you want to mention the --with-ssl switch, to use SSL/TLS for secure > connections, > again it's an extra. Right now I have entries for --with-ssl and --with-sasl and have removed --enable-smtp from the defaults. I think that's sufficient. The sasl entry is hopefully clear enough that SMTP authentication needs sasl. -- Dan -- http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/blfs-book FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/blfs/faq.html Unsubscribe: See the above information page
