[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote these words on 08/18/07 14:13 CST: > Author: dj > Date: 2007-08-18 13:13:04 -0600 (Sat, 18 Aug 2007) > New Revision: 7083 > > Modified: > trunk/BOOK/general.ent > trunk/BOOK/introduction/welcome/changelog.xml > trunk/BOOK/xsoft/suites/openoffice.xml > Log: > Updated to OpenOffice-2.2.1 > > + <para>Unlike other BLFS packages,
Could you change the above to just 'The'? There are other BLFS packages distributed in multiple tarballs, so it isn't really an accurate statement. > <application>OpenOffice</application> > + source code is now distributed in several tarballs. You should extract > + each from the same top-level directory before entering the build > + direcotry. At a minimum, you will need to extract the src and core > + tarballs. Additionally, the source direcotry name is not consistent > + with the tarball name amd will be called OOF680_m18.</para> s/direcotry/directory/ (in two places) s/called OOF680_m18/named OOF680_m18/ Really nice work, DJ. I know that is a huge package that took you quite a bit of time to get done. BTW - What about this JDK bug that was put in Trac today? In that bug someone says that OOo won't build using JDK6. That must be BS huh? -- Randy rmlscsi: [bogomips 1003.27] [GNU ld version 2.16.1] [gcc (GCC) 4.0.3] [GNU C Library stable release version 2.3.6] [Linux 2.6.14.3 i686] 14:54:00 up 2 days, 3:07, 1 user, load average: 0.08, 0.04, 0.01 -- http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/blfs-book FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/blfs/faq.html Unsubscribe: See the above information page
