[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote these words on 02/19/08 00:11 CST: > Modified: > trunk/BOOK/general.ent > trunk/BOOK/introduction/welcome/changelog.xml > trunk/BOOK/postlfs/filesystems/xfs.xml > trunk/BOOK/server/major/openssh.xml > Log: > Added note about OpenSSH testsuite failures. > Modified: trunk/BOOK/introduction/welcome/changelog.xml > =================================================================== > --- trunk/BOOK/introduction/welcome/changelog.xml 2008-02-13 06:49:40 UTC > (rev 7183) > +++ trunk/BOOK/introduction/welcome/changelog.xml 2008-02-19 06:11:00 UTC > (rev 7184) > @@ -41,6 +41,16 @@ > > --> > <listitem> > + <para>February 19th, 2008</para> > + <itemizedlist> > + <listitem> > + <para>[dj] - Added note about OpenSSH testsuite failures.</para>
Probably wouldn't hurt to update the ChangeLog with the XFS version increment. > > + <note><para>The test suite is currently broken, in that it will try to > + test against the installed <filename>sshd</filename>, Should be <command> tags, probably. > which is why we > + pass <parameter>-k</parameter> to the <command>make</command> command > + above. "We". Who exactly is "we"? :-) You should run the test suite again after completing the > + installation and configuration, without the <parameter>-k</parameter> > + flag.</para></note> This really needs to be reworded. It says to run the tests, but then it says it is broken and to run them later. Which is it? Now or later? Running it twice just to see if it breaks seems a bit odd. Seems it would be trivial to change the call in the tests to use the newly created sshd. -- Randy rmlscsi: [bogomips 1003.22] [GNU ld version 2.16.1] [gcc (GCC) 4.0.3] [GNU C Library stable release version 2.3.6] [Linux 2.6.14.3 i686] 07:36:00 up 1 day, 23:21, 1 user, load average: 0.09, 0.03, 0.01 -- http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/blfs-book FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/blfs/faq.html Unsubscribe: See the above information page
