[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote these words on 04/05/08 02:19 CST: > Author: ag > Date: 2008-04-05 01:19:38 -0600 (Sat, 05 Apr 2008) > New Revision: 7347 > > Modified: > trunk/BOOK/general.ent > trunk/BOOK/introduction/welcome/changelog.xml > trunk/BOOK/postlfs/editors/ed.xml > Log: > Replaced with symlinks the hard links to red and its man page
Why was this done? I'm not really in favor of changing author's code unless there is really a reason to do it (makes something better, or fixes a problem). In this case, I don't see any difference other than we changed it. Take the python and python-2.5 files. Same thing but we don't change it. I'd like to put it back the way it was unless there's some reason to keep it a symlink. -- Randy rmlscsi: [bogomips 1003.22] [GNU ld version 2.16.1] [gcc (GCC) 4.0.3] [GNU C Library stable release version 2.3.6] [Linux 2.6.14.3 i686] 14:24:00 up 51 days, 5:12, 1 user, load average: 0.00, 0.11, 0.32 -- http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/blfs-book FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/blfs/faq.html Unsubscribe: See the above information page
