[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > Log: > Updated to Mesa-7.2. > > + <warning><para>Mesa's GLUT library in not released under a free software > + license. Permission is grated by the copyright holder for its use with > + in the Mesa distribution. <xref linkend="freeglut"/> is strongly > + recommended over Mesa.</para></warning>
Can we not make this a warning, but perhaps a note instead? I don't think it should be a warning. If we are strongly recommending to use Freeglut, why are we even mentioning MesaGlut on the page. Shouldn't we completely remove anything about it and simply make FreeGlut an optional dependency? Additionally there are two typos: library in not (is) with in (within) > + <para>Build <application>MesaLib</application> by running the following > + commands:</para> > > - <para>Install <application>MesaLib</application> by running the following > - command:</para> Why is this being changed? Let's leave it as it was. Install is much more accurate, and installing the package is the goal of the instructions. -- Randy -- http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/blfs-book FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/blfs/faq.html Unsubscribe: See the above information page
