Randy McMurchy wrote: > [email protected] wrote these words on 12/27/08 18:11 CST: > >> -<!ENTITY day "27"> <!-- Always 2 digits --> >> +<!ENTITY day "28"> <!-- Always 2 digits --> >> <!ENTITY month "12"> <!-- Always 2 digits --> >> <!ENTITY year "2008"> >> <!ENTITY copyrightdate "2001-&year;"> >> >> Modified: trunk/BOOK/introduction/welcome/changelog.xml >> =================================================================== >> --- trunk/BOOK/introduction/welcome/changelog.xml 2008-12-27 22:05:53 UTC >> (rev 7677) >> +++ trunk/BOOK/introduction/welcome/changelog.xml 2008-12-28 00:11:12 UTC >> (rev 7678) >> @@ -44,6 +44,9 @@ >> <para>December 27th, 2008</para> >> <itemizedlist> >> <listitem> >> + <para>[bdubbs] - Changed PCI Utils to use uncompressed pci.ids >> file.</para> >> + </listitem> > > It's always been confusing to me when the date of the book doesn't > match an entry in the ChangeLog. And for a commit, the ChangeLog > should reflect the actual date of the book. No big deal, but like > I say, it has always been confusing when they don't match. > > I realize a simple typo that is fixed and the date updated without > a changelog brings on that same confusion, but if we can avoid > (as in this case) doing it, we should.
Randy, It wasn't a typo. The date of the render will be approximately 0230 on the 28th. The changes were added on the 27th. I can change my algorithm to set the book's date to the date of the last change log entry if you really want. -- Bruce -- http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/blfs-book FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/blfs/faq.html Unsubscribe: See the above information page
