Ken Moffat wrote these words on 03/02/09 12:56 CST: > But, as we have now established, when firefox is built on top of > xulrunner, the switch is redundant. So, system-cairo is enabled in > the xulrunner mozconfig and commented for firefoxi (doh!, these > extraneous vowels will be the death of me).
I just don't understand. Could you please lay it out in layman's terms. I'm not trying to be a pest, I'm trying to understand. Your messages seem to completely miss my point. I'll ask a simple question. Please just answer it in simple terms. When would one ever build stand-alone Firefox without cairo being on the system? I have more questions, but let's do this one at a time. -- Randy rmlscsi: [bogomips 1003.24] [GNU ld version 2.16.1] [gcc (GCC) 4.0.3] [GNU C Library stable release version 2.3.6] [Linux 2.6.14.3 i686] 13:09:01 up 2 days, 23:08, 1 user, load average: 0.25, 0.09, 0.06 -- http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/blfs-book FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/blfs/faq.html Unsubscribe: See the above information page
