[email protected] wrote these words on 07/26/09 09:06 CST: > Author: gdalziel > Date: 2009-07-26 08:06:55 -0600 (Sun, 26 Jul 2009) > New Revision: 7872 > <sect1 id="libpng" xreflabel="libpng-&libpng-version;"> > @@ -61,8 +61,8 @@ > <application>libpng</application> : <ulink > url="&patch-root;/libpng-&libpng-version;-apng-1.patch"/></para> > <para>Although rejected by upstream, this is required if you want > - to use your system <filename class="libraryfile">libpng</filename> > - for Firefox 3.</para> > + to use <filename class="libraryfile">libpng</filename> in > + <application>Firefox</application> 3.</para>
It is now technically incorrect. By removing "your system", you imply you must use the patch to use libpng. But that is not true as you could use libpng that ships in the Firefox tarball. I would put those two words back in, simply so that it then becomes technically correct -- Randy rmlscsi: [bogomips 1003.25] [GNU ld version 2.16.1] [gcc (GCC) 4.0.3] [GNU C Library stable release version 2.3.6] [Linux 2.6.14.3 i686] 09:19:01 up 19 days, 21:47, 1 user, load average: 0.33, 0.08, 0.03 -- http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/blfs-book FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/blfs/faq.html Unsubscribe: See the above information page
