#2690: udftools-1.0.0b3 no longer builds
--------------------------------------+-------------------------------------
 Reporter:  k...@…                     |       Owner:  blfs-b...@…              
     
     Type:  defect                    |      Status:  new                       
    
 Priority:  normal                    |   Milestone:  6.5                       
    
Component:  BOOK                      |     Version:  SVN                       
    
 Severity:  normal                    |    Keywords:                            
    
--------------------------------------+-------------------------------------

Old description:

> Some of this is gcc-4.3, some of it might even be the kernel header
> changes in 2.6.23.
>
> Fedora has a metric shed load of changes to this.  I tried cherry picking
> their changes to cdrwtool.c, and then pktsetup.c, but that just let it
> die in wrudf.c with
> {{{
> wrudf.c: In function ‘initialise’:
> wrudf.c:248: error: lvalue required as left operand of assignment
> make[1]: *** [wrudf.o] Error 1
> }}}
>
> I tried using parts of their warningfixes2.patch which makes some changes
> to wrudf.c, but the first hunk in that file doesn't apply (probably
> depends on another of their patches), and with that hunk dropped the rest
> of the patch makes no change to that error.
>
> Upstream appears to be defunct.  I don't have any interest in this
> package, so unless someone cares to fix it I think we should drop it.

New description:

 Some of this is gcc-4.3, some of it might even be the kernel header
 changes in 2.6.23.

 Fedora has a metric shed load of changes to this.  I tried cherry picking
 their changes to cdrwtool.c, and then pktsetup.c, but that just let it die
 in wrudf.c with
 {{{
 wrudf.c: In function `initialise':
 wrudf.c:248: error: lvalue required as left operand of assignment
 make[1]: *** [wrudf.o] Error 1
 }}}

 I tried using parts of their warningfixes2.patch which makes some changes
 to wrudf.c, but the first hunk in that file doesn't apply (probably
 depends on another of their patches), and with that hunk dropped the rest
 of the patch makes no change to that error.

 Upstream appears to be defunct.  I don't have any interest in this
 package, so unless someone cares to fix it I think we should drop it.

--

Comment(by gdalziel):

 Ken, is there still an issue with this? I just compiled it using the patch
 and the sed and it appears to be fine, the only additional issues were
 that the two files you mentioned needed limits.h.

-- 
Ticket URL: <http://wiki.linuxfromscratch.org/blfs/ticket/2690#comment:4>
BLFS Trac <http://wiki.linuxfromscratch.org/blfs>
Beyond Linux From Scratch
-- 
http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/blfs-book
FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/blfs/faq.html
Unsubscribe: See the above information page

Reply via email to