-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

BLFS Trac wrote:
> #2482: GNOME-2.26.3
> ----------------------------------------+-----------------------------------
>  Reporter:  ra...@…                     |       Owner:  wblaszcz
>      Type:  task                        |      Status:  new     
>  Priority:  normal                      |   Milestone:  6.5     
> Component:  BOOK                        |     Version:  SVN     
>  Severity:  normal                      |    Keywords:          
> ----------------------------------------+-----------------------------------
> 
> Comment(by d...@…):
> 
>  Wayne, I'll look at my installation logs and get those for you.  Also, I
>  wanted to note all the changes that I've been working on and commenting on
>  in -dev for an easier read for you as I'd like for you to verify all of
>  them.
> 
>  1. GSD needs a patch to provide it's libexecdir for use by GDM.
>  2. ConsoleKit needs a patch to provide it's libexecdir for use by GDM.
>  http://archive.linuxfromscratch.org/mail-archives/blfs-
>  dev/2009-September/020024.html
> 
>  3. GDM needs major surgery to take advantage of the above 2 changes, in
>  addition, the location of the X server is not determined by pkg-config,
>  which is mentioned in this first link.
>  http://archive.linuxfromscratch.org/mail-archives/blfs-
>  dev/2009-September/020007.html
>  The patch referenced in the following message is a complete build-fix
>  patch that contains both of the current patches, plus the one above and
>  takes into account the changes needed to take advantage of the differing
>  libexec dirs and the dbus daemondir.
>  http://archive.linuxfromscratch.org/mail-archives/blfs-
>  dev/2009-September/020027.html
> 
> 
>  4. Gnome Icon Theme is installing to a gnome subdir of /usr/share/icons
>  instead of the old default of hicolor, which is currently expected.
>  http://archive.linuxfromscratch.org/mail-archives/blfs-
>  dev/2009-September/020028.html
> 
>  5. libxklavier needs a patch to find the proper location of xkb rules.
>  The patch I posted is not suitable for upstream as I've made xkb an
>  unconditional requirement...it could probably be fixed for upstream use,
>  but the patch as posted works for LFS's purposes.
>  http://archive.linuxfromscratch.org/mail-archives/blfs-
>  dev/2009-September/020015.html
> 
>  6. libproxy chokes on current XULRunner/Firefox because of the
>  stable/unstable split.  Sami Tarazi has posted a fix:
>  http://archive.linuxfromscratch.org/mail-archives/blfs-
>  dev/2009-September/020020.html
> 
>  I think that is all that I have ATM.  Let me know if you want my build
>  scripts for the rest of Gnome that I have completed.  So far, everything
>  looks to be really, really solid now.
> 
Thanks for that, I look at this closer in a few days time. Currently I'm
preoccupied with other things out side of BLFS, Hopefully I get back
into the swing of things in the next few days. As I mentioned before,
I'm going to look at 2.28.0. If it's not to drastic, and I get a
successfully core build with no new bugs/problems, I'll submit it all at
once. Has anyone got any objections to this?
Regards,
Wayne.
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.7 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org

iD8DBQFKwJx3hfgHoRhX2wIRAvy4AJ9eVcKugrm03rdYjZQ9ILP8sQtq9gCfbPvB
w7PysIq05YrRE1B7aKVozCU=
=oYtT
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
-- 
http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/blfs-book
FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/blfs/faq.html
Unsubscribe: See the above information page

Reply via email to