On 02/07/2013 08:38 PM, Randy McMurchy wrote: > Armin K. wrote these words on 02/07/13 13:34 CST: >> Wait, please revert this. LFS 7.0 and LFS 7.1 didn't had pkg-config >> installed by default iirc because it depended on glib which would drag >> python and libffi. Bruce said that we want to support LFS 7.0+, not only >> latest Stable LFS + Latest Development one. > > Good point, although about half of them were already commented out. Let's > discuss on -dev about supporting versions of LFS from so long ago. We've > got sed commands for newer Glibc and other such stuff that ?could? break > the older version as well. I don't think we can support multiple versions > of LFS without some breakages. >
Well, as for Glibc, there is no problem with that. The features were probably deprecated long ago before they were removed. I mean, if I add an extra header to includes, everything will surely break - please ... -- http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/blfs-book FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/blfs/faq.html Unsubscribe: See the above information page
