Em 14-05-2013 22:01, BLFS Trac escreveu: > #3852: firefox-21.0 > -------------------------+-------------------------- > Reporter: ken@… | Owner: blfs-book@… > Type: enhancement | Status: new > Priority: normal | Milestone: current > Component: BOOK | Version: SVN > Severity: normal | Resolution: > Keywords: | > -------------------------+-------------------------- > > Comment (by ken@…): > > Hmm, on LFS-7.3 [ gcc-4.7.2 ] it's worse - xulrunner fails to build, but > I've got two unkillable cc1plus jobs still taking about 100% cpu each. > > No idea if it was the same error, but can someone remind me why we bother > to build xulrunner now, please ? I know that it used to appear to be the > right thing to do (looked as if e.g. thunderbird would one day be able to > use it), and my measurements appeared to show it was quicker to build both > (might have been mistaken), but apart from firefox, what uses it ? I've a > vague memory of java perhaps needing it ? >
It was gnash that needed xulrunner. I have just build lfs SVN-20130512 (first time with jhalfs) and am following in chroot to try and build up to FF, there (after your post days ago), that is why I am not trying FF just now. -- []s, Fernando -- http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/blfs-book FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/blfs/faq.html Unsubscribe: See the above information page
