#11679: Move lxde to GTK3
-----------------------------+------------------------------
 Reporter:  pierre.labastie  |       Owner:  pierre.labastie
     Type:  enhancement      |      Status:  assigned
 Priority:  normal           |   Milestone:  8.5
Component:  BOOK             |     Version:  SVN
 Severity:  normal           |  Resolution:
 Keywords:                   |
-----------------------------+------------------------------

Comment (by renodr):

 An interesting footnote:

 {{{
 Looking further ahead, the GTK version of LXDE will be dropped and all
 efforts will be focused on the Qt port. We, the main developers and
 administrators of the projects, will try to figure out where we align and
 where we have differences to grind out.
 }}}

 [https://blog.lxde.org/2013/07/22/the-future-of-razor-and-lxde-qt/]

 I don't know if anything has changed since then,  but PCManFM's creator
 having a serious disdain for GTK+-3 does not bode well for the future of
 LXDE. I get that it's lightweight, but it's not without its problems. One
 of those is that it doesn't start a dbus-session by default, as I have to
 start one myself in a terminal anytime I want to run a test suite for
 packages that need it (and I use LXDE to run tests for some GNOME
 components before I get a working GNOME Shell installed). Recent issues
 such as the LXPanel bug do not bode confidence either IMO. Because
 Qt5-based DEs start the user-session for dbus-daemon automatically upon
 startup, I don't have to worry about this. XFCE does it as well, but that
 goes into Thunar's dependency on GVFS.

 [https://blog.lxde.org/2013/03/26/pcmanfm-qt-0-1-0-released/]

 This is just my 0.02c though. As the guy who does GNOME, I will have
 different opinions than others.

--
Ticket URL: <http://wiki.linuxfromscratch.org/blfs/ticket/11679#comment:10>
BLFS Trac <http://wiki.linuxfromscratch.org/blfs>
Beyond Linux From Scratch
-- 
http://lists.linuxfromscratch.org/listinfo/blfs-book
FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/blfs/faq.html
Unsubscribe: See the above information page

Reply via email to