Hi all, Linux-PAM installs the following libraries into the /lib directory: libpam, libpamc and libpam_misc. Both static and dynamic libs are installed.
The instructions move the .a libs to /usr/lib and create .so symlinks to the /lib/libname.so.0.78 files in /usr/lib as well. What I'm curious about is why the .so symlinks are created as there are already these .so symlinks in /lib. Typically, the .so symlinks in /lib are removed and appropriate symlinks in /usr/lib are then made. However, with Linux-PAM we end up so .so symlinks in both /lib and /usr/lib. Should the /lib .so symlinks be removed? If not, do we need to create these same symlinks in /usr/lib? -- Randy rmlinux: [GNU ld version 2.15.91.0.2 20040727] [gcc (GCC) 3.4.1] [GNU C Library 2004-07-01 release version 2.3.4] [Linux 2.6.8.1 i686] 22:27:00 up 16 days, 6:16, 8 users, load average: 0.00, 0.02, 0.00 -- http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/blfs-dev FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/blfs/faq.html Unsubscribe: See the above information page
