On February 22, 2005 07:07 pm, Randy McMurchy wrote: > Though I'm not certain Gerard was just talking about symlinks named > *.so, I was. The whole point of this discussion was what to do with > *symlinks* named *.so.
Yes I meant symlinks though I didn't specify it. We can't of course control actual library files that are named improperly. Well, I suppose we could fix that during the installations of the packages but I'm not sure if we should start to do such a thing. -- Gerard Beekmans /* If Linux doesn't have the solution, you have the wrong problem */ -- http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/blfs-dev FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/blfs/faq.html Unsubscribe: See the above information page
