Rincewind wrote these words on 03/07/05 11:28 CST: > Randy McMurchy wrote: > >> >> Unless there's some compelling reason to update the XFce package >> for the BLFS-6.0 release, I'm going to reflag this package update >> as 'future' instead of BLFS-6.0. >> > > I suggest updating to 4.2.0, which is much better than 4.0.4 (it also > has support for antialiased fonts) and will not require great changes to > the book instructions. > [snip nice explanation]
This is great and all, and I'm sure that someone will get around to it after BLFS-6.0, but I was looking for some *compelling* reason to do this. We want to get BLFS-6.0 out the door, I'm looking for a reason that it *must* be done before 6.0, not for reasons why it *would be nice* to get it done. -- Randy rmlscsi: [GNU ld version 2.15.94.0.2 20041220] [gcc (GCC) 3.4.3] [GNU C Library stable release version 2.3.4] [Linux 2.6.10 i686] 11:34:00 up 4 days, 21:38, 2 users, load average: 0.02, 0.04, 0.00 -- http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/blfs-dev FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/blfs/faq.html Unsubscribe: See the above information page
