Matthew Burgess escribi� en blfs.dev el S�bado, 19 de Marzo de 2005 10:43:
> Actually Randy, if I understand Manuel correctly, the package should > only be considered "broken" if it references 'current' *and* it > customises the stylesheets (due to customisation parameters changing > between versions, etc.). If gtk-doc does no such customisation, then > you should be fine putting the 'current' link in the book, and I'd be as > bold as to suggest it goes in the 'xsl-stylesheets' instructions. Correct. For XSL to remap "current" to the most newest version is fine. "current" is used when processing XML docs using the stock XSL release. What is wrong is to remap an old XSL version to a new one (like the remap of 1.65.1 to 1.67.2 in BLFS), due that harcoded XSL versions are found tipically in customized templates, that relies upon that concret XSL version and may not work well with a new one. -- Manuel Canales Esparcia Usuario de LFS n� 2886: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/ LFS en castellano: http://www.escomposlinux.org/lfs-es http://www.lfs-es.com TLDP-ES http://es.tldp.org -- http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/blfs-dev FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/blfs/faq.html Unsubscribe: See the above information page
