Looking at the book for ncftp (which seems to be stuck at 3.1.7 - the canonical site appears to have had 3.1.8 for some months) - I can vaguely remember that there used to be something funny about the licensing on this, so I looked in the source to see what the alternative was to using the Clarified Artistic License, and indeed what license would apply to linking other code against the shared library.
( the book specifically mentions the Clarified Artistic License, but only in relation to building and using the shared library ) Now I'm confused - the only license I can see is the Clarified Artistic, which implies that both build methods have the same license ? And where are the restrictions for linking other code against the shared library ? Ken -- das eine Mal als Trag�die, das andere Mal als Farce -- http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/blfs-dev FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/blfs/faq.html Unsubscribe: See the above information page
