Archaic wrote these words on 04/18/05 22:52 CST: > Get off your high horse, Randy. He explicitly stated why he did it and > it did not involve avoiding the use of BLFS. If he needs the package for > use now before he has the chance to build it, who are you to judge him > for it? > > Just chill out, please.
What is with you, Archaic? It's like you've been to a sensitivity class and need to put everyone in their place. Please, just mind your own business. I realize what I'm typing. I'm downright surprised that the BLFS Editor would come out on the development list and say that he didn't want to build one of the BLFS packages and used the precompiled version instead. [okay, just went and had a smoke, thought about things] I'm still convinced that Bruce should not have announced his problems with a precompiled version of a BLFS package without trying to at least build it first. I mean really, what does this say about our book, when the Editor doesn't even use it? -- Randy rmlscsi: [GNU ld version 2.15.94.0.2 20041220] [gcc (GCC) 3.4.3] [GNU C Library stable release version 2.3.4] [Linux 2.6.10 i686] 22:56:00 up 16 days, 22:29, 3 users, load average: 0.26, 0.24, 0.14 -- http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/blfs-dev FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/blfs/faq.html Unsubscribe: See the above information page
