Robert Connolly wrote: > On April 27, 2005 12:20 am, DJ Lucas wrote: > >>Robert, please also see the thread 'OpenOffice bug in BZ' for >>an additional patch. > > > I found openoffice.org-1.9.69.doublefree.patch and renamed it to > OOo_1.1.4-doublefree.patch so the blfs instructions should work with it. It > doesn't need to be rediffed. After the 8 patches, I ran 'find . -name > "*.rej"' and it was clear. > > robert
I kinda guess the rejected hunks won't matter...unless there are changes within a few lines of the cvs headers. I have the broken one so the needed changes to bring it back to the BLFS spec (with propsets in svn) shoud be easy as Robert has shown above. Robert you're in the ballpark now. Again, I am so very sorry for the mishaps. Thanks again for the help. -- DJ Lucas -- http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/blfs-dev FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/blfs/faq.html Unsubscribe: See the above information page
