On Thu, Jun 30, 2005 at 12:30:50PM -0500, Randy McMurchy wrote: > > Having a symlink named spell matters not to me, however, I fail to > see how this affects LFS. During an LFS install, Ispell is not installed, > why make accommodations for something that doesn't exit.
I am trying to more accurately provide a description. I did not say that it would work in a base LFS or that I'm even trying to make it work. As it is, the description of the file is that it relies on a command that doesn't exist in either book. However, ispell most certainly does exist and since BLFS installs both ispell and vim, I was asking here if this is something that might warrant inclusion. > Furthermore, perhaps just a mention in the BLFS Vim instructions to > move the vimspell.sh file into the path *and* create a symlink named > spell (if Ispell is installed) would be more appropriate. Yes, that does sound like the best approach. -- Archaic Want control, education, and security from your operating system? Hardened Linux From Scratch http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/hlfs -- http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/blfs-dev FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/blfs/faq.html Unsubscribe: See the above information page
