Greg Schafer wrote these words on 08/17/05 18:29 CST: > Me is no toolchain expert. Those folks who write the toolchain code are > the real experts. But I'll say my piece anyway :-)
First of all, thanks for your input. > <slightly OT> > If it's true that the patch is no longer required, then LFS has been > unnecessarily maintaining this patch for ages. It's easy to get patches > into LFS.. but it's harder to get them out :-) I recall removing a stack > of unnecessary patches from LFS after the 5.0 release was shipped. "Patch > rot" is a generic problem that needs more attention. > </slightly OT> This very well may be true. However, who in the LFS community would have the knowledge and experience to say that a toolchain related patch is no longer necessary? -- Randy rmlscsi: [GNU ld version 2.15.94.0.2 20041220] [gcc (GCC) 3.4.3] [GNU C Library stable release version 2.3.4] [Linux 2.6.10 i686] 18:35:01 up 137 days, 18:08, 3 users, load average: 0.15, 0.07, 0.28 -- http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/blfs-dev FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/blfs/faq.html Unsubscribe: See the above information page
