Archaic wrote these words on 09/26/05 19:27 CST:

> Not unless you want an absolute flurry of support questions. SELinux
> will completely change the security model of an LFS system.

The reason I asked about this is because I like being technically
accurate, however, I'm not knowledgeable enough about SELinux to
determine if one can *convert* his LFS system into a SELinux-enabled
system, or if one must *build* the system using the SELinux patches
to the various core LFS packages.

If the latter, then I don't have a problem with not mentioning
SELinux as a dependency. If the former, I'm negligent by not
mentioning it.

Can you help me determine which it is?

-- 
Randy

rmlscsi: [GNU ld version 2.15.94.0.2 20041220] [gcc (GCC) 3.4.3]
[GNU C Library stable release version 2.3.4] [Linux 2.6.10 i686]
19:32:00 up 2 days, 3:56, 3 users, load average: 0.00, 0.09, 0.33
-- 
http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/blfs-dev
FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/blfs/faq.html
Unsubscribe: See the above information page

Reply via email to