On 10/19/05, Andrew Benton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Dan Nicholson wrote: > > Glancing through /usr/sbin on my system for BLFS > > packages, I see things such as sshd and usermod that I definitely want > > in root's path. What about sftp-server? I'm not sure if that should be > > called or not. What about alsaconf and alsactl? > > alsactl is needed to restore volume levels after you reboot so it needs to be > in roots path.
Thanks, but I really just wrote that to show an example. As Tushar said in a different post in this thread, each package is going to have to be examined about what goes into sbin lib or lib/packagename. It sounds like it could be a lot of extra work, and there would inevitably be arguments about sbin vs. lib/packagename similar to the /bin vs. /usr/bin arguments on LFS-dev. But I suppose if the editor working on the package wants to hash out what goes where, I'll probably follow their instructions. -- Dan -- http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/blfs-dev FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/blfs/faq.html Unsubscribe: See the above information page
