Justin Knierim wrote these words on 11/03/05 12:39 CST: > While changing download locations for the LiveCD, I had a problem with > sha1sums (but md5sums are also effected) of the patches not matching. > Is this difference, for example, between the patch from > /patches/downloads/libpng and /blfs/downloads/svn caused by svn or > something else? Just want to know for my info. For the blfs repo, I > pull all patches from the blfs book urls.
It is very likely that patches in the BLFS repo and the ones in the LFS repo won't be identical. Though functionality is the same, they won't be identical. In fact, I think it would be hard to get them identical. And they are all (even very old ones that haven't changed in a long time) going to be different because when BLFS 6.1 was released, Bruce inadvertently deleted the SVN repo, then had to restore it. So, with that, all the $lastchangedby$ and $date$ entities where updated. Hence, the difference between LFS and BLFS repos. Furthermore, to sync them would be difficult (well, not really difficult, but time consuming). HTH. -- Randy rmlscsi: [GNU ld version 2.15.94.0.2 20041220] [gcc (GCC) 3.4.3] [GNU C Library stable release version 2.3.4] [Linux 2.6.10 i686] 12:28:00 up 39 days, 21:52, 3 users, load average: 0.02, 0.19, 0.41 -- http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/blfs-dev FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/blfs/faq.html Unsubscribe: See the above information page
