Steffen R. Knollmann wrote these words on 11/17/05 11:29 CST: > I don't know about Sound-Juicer, I always use cdparanoia and oggenc, > but as mentioned above, it might be that the quality setting you use is > high enough to cover the bug.
Don't know. I used whatever was the default in Sound Juicer. Either way though, the patch you sent in will be put in the book, just as soon as I get to it. I'm in the process of adding Sound Juicer to the GNOME add-on section right now. I never doubted you, especially seeing how the libvorbis maintainer closed the Xiph bug as "Fixed". There was much work and testing on this bug according to the bug log. There's no reason for me not to trust the patch. My whole question was about the Sound Juicer thing and me not being able to distinguish the "quality loss". -- Randy rmlscsi: [GNU ld version 2.15.94.0.2 20041220] [gcc (GCC) 3.4.3] [GNU C Library stable release version 2.3.4] [Linux 2.6.10 i686] 11:48:00 up 53 days, 21:12, 3 users, load average: 0.23, 0.06, 0.11 -- http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/blfs-dev FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/blfs/faq.html Unsubscribe: See the above information page
