Jeremy Huntwork wrote:
It would definitely help the workload if some packages in BLFS were
removed. For starters, perhaps BLFS could employ a policy that any that
are just a simple CMMI install (or ones which are easy to tweak by
referencing ./configure --help) won't have an entire page. Where they
are dependencies of other packages, link to an appendix which contains
just a URL to the developer site and any small notes about known issues,
ie, patches/i18n/multilib.
1) For CMMI packages, the following information is useful:
* The list of dependencies
* The URLs
* The fact that it is indeed a CMMI package with no build-time caveats
2) AFAIK, Randy is going to add instructions for converting texinfo
documentation to other formats. After such addition, a previously-CMMI
package may no longer count as such.
--
Alexander E. Patrakov
Don't mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]: the server is off until 2006-01-11
Use my GMail or linuxfromscratch address instead
--
http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/blfs-dev
FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/blfs/faq.html
Unsubscribe: See the above information page
