On Mon, 09 Jan 2006 18:22:22 -0600 Randy McMurchy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> DJ Lucas wrote these words on 01/09/06 18:09 CST: > > > I'll put up a more recent set if anyone would like to > > look at them that accounts for the issues that have been found > > recently. > > At this point, I can't help but think that 6.9.0 is the only way to > go. Unless there is some good way to keep the building of Xorg in the > spirit of BLFS (not completely automated), I can't see any value > going to the 7.0, if 6.9.0 affords the same exact code with an > installation method we all know and trust. > > Of course, we need to keep working towards the modular Xorg, but > right now, I'm not sure this first release is really ready for us. > > The LiveCD notwithstanding. :-) > I agree to some extent, but I actually learned a few new things from the samples pages in ~dj/blfs-xorg7. It's sometimes nice to break the mould, so that other approaches get better airings. R. -- http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/blfs-dev FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/blfs/faq.html Unsubscribe: See the above information page
