Alexander E. Patrakov wrote these words on 01/22/06 22:48 CST: > So we are comparing automated build of Xorg components vs automated > build of Xorg components. What's the differende, from the educational > standpoint?
Apparently, Alexander, you did not read my earlier comments, and instead just picked on one sentence I wrote in which to debate. I clearly said that it wasn't so much for the educational standpoint that I'm against scripting, it is because that is just not that way we've always done it, and I don't see this package as a reason to change. You're comparing a maintainer's installation script/method with something that we (BLFS developers) come up with. Alexander, this is night and day. Apples and oranges. I'm not sure I follow the point of your message, unless it was to ask why using a maintainer's script is any different than us writing our own script. In which case I don't even see the comparison and I cannot see the value in discussing it. -- Randy rmlscsi: [GNU ld version 2.15.94.0.2 20041220] [gcc (GCC) 3.4.3] [GNU C Library stable release version 2.3.4] [Linux 2.6.10 i686] 23:05:01 up 120 days, 8:29, 3 users, load average: 1.14, 0.65, 0.30 -- http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/blfs-dev FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/blfs/faq.html Unsubscribe: See the above information page
