Dan Nicholson wrote these words on 01/23/06 15:52 CST: > It's supposed to be optional. They just did a poor job of packaging, > and apparently no one tested the installation without Doxygen.
You have to hope that upstream does that kind of testing, which obviously they didn't. Here in BLFSland, it would be impossible to test every package with and without every dependency. > Simple, but I doubt that you can still install the Doxygen files with > it if you have it installed. I actually don't know what happens if a > target is specified twice in a Makefile. > > No mention upstream for the same reason no mention here. I was > frustrated and trying to get to my ultimate goal of gphoto/f-spot, so > I just hacked up some fixes and moved on. I'll look into it after I get Thunderbird and Mozilla finished. TBird is ready, just have to commit, and Mozilla isn't too far behind. -- Randy rmlscsi: [GNU ld version 2.15.94.0.2 20041220] [gcc (GCC) 3.4.3] [GNU C Library stable release version 2.3.4] [Linux 2.6.10 i686] 15:52:01 up 121 days, 1:16, 3 users, load average: 0.12, 0.03, 0.14 -- http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/blfs-dev FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/blfs/faq.html Unsubscribe: See the above information page
