Tushar Teredesai wrote these words on 01/23/06 18:26 CST: > Please, no more recommended section, especially for patches :-) IMO > there should be just two things - Required and Optional.
Not to start an argument, or even a discussion about it for that matter, unless it is wanted, I disagree. There sometimes is a gray area, it may not always be black and white. I know I've argued against frivolous use of "Recommended", so it may appear my argument is conflicting with previous statements. But I do think that there is *some* proper use of Recommended dependencies. -- Randy rmlscsi: [GNU ld version 2.15.94.0.2 20041220] [gcc (GCC) 3.4.3] [GNU C Library stable release version 2.3.4] [Linux 2.6.10 i686] 18:30:00 up 121 days, 3:54, 3 users, load average: 0.30, 0.51, 0.68 -- http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/blfs-dev FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/blfs/faq.html Unsubscribe: See the above information page
