Jeremy Huntwork wrote these words on 01/23/06 21:25 CST: > Actually, after reading this again. You could almost drop the first > sentence entirely. What it says is implied by the second two - but I > don't really have an opinion either way.
Though I appreciate your help, and much of what you said in your prior mail will be used to rewrite the text, you are wrong in what you say above. I just described it so poorly that even you, with lots of experience, couldn't understand my meaning. That first sentence was a way of trying to explain in short words the .mozconfig file. The next sentence tries to explain why we call client.mk. These concepts are independent. Unfortunately, I explained it so poorly that my meaning didn't even come across to *you* correctly. God help the novice. -- Randy rmlscsi: [GNU ld version 2.15.94.0.2 20041220] [gcc (GCC) 3.4.3] [GNU C Library stable release version 2.3.4] [Linux 2.6.10 i686] 21:32:01 up 121 days, 6:56, 3 users, load average: 0.16, 0.35, 0.66 -- http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/blfs-dev FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/blfs/faq.html Unsubscribe: See the above information page
