Tushar Teredesai wrote these words on 01/24/06 00:46 CST: > On 1/24/06, Randy McMurchy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >>If so, I feel pretty good about it. > > You should, it is a job well done :)
Coming from you makes me think we probably won't have any issues with the package. Thanks, Tushar. Little things like this make it all worthwhile. :-) > Saw couple of minor shortcuts that can be taken though. The .so files > can be installed with "install -v -m755 $NSS_LINUXDIR/lib/lib*.so > /usr/lib". Ditto for .chk files. Though, having the files listed is > also nice. I like your suggestions. The individual files that are installed are annotated in the "Installed Files" section, so I'm not sure that anything is gained by listing them during installation. I'll wait for further comment from anyone before we do anything. If there's no real reason to keep it the way it is, I think it should be changed to what you suggest. > BTW, Dan mentioned some useful tools that came with the package. Any > plans on installing those as an optional thing? I don't know what to about these. I mentioned this in an earlier email, but didn't get anything constructive on what should be done with these programs (I thought for sure you would comment). Do realize that there is a mention in the instructions that these files exist, where they are located, and that that you can do with them what you need to. Is this enough? -- Randy rmlscsi: [GNU ld version 2.15.94.0.2 20041220] [gcc (GCC) 3.4.3] [GNU C Library stable release version 2.3.4] [Linux 2.6.10 i686] 01:02:00 up 121 days, 10:26, 3 users, load average: 1.09, 0.37, 0.21 -- http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/blfs-dev FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/blfs/faq.html Unsubscribe: See the above information page
