Randy McMurchy wrote:
> If it turns out that SeaMonkey is just a fork, and that both > >continue to thrive, then perhaps, maybe, but it would take serious >consideration to keep such *almost exact same packages* alive >in the BLFS book. > > Would it make sense to remove the Mozilla page and add the Sea Monkey page but, on the sea monkey page have a note that you can install mozilla with the instructions on this page? It does seem pointless to maintain two identical packages in the blfs book. -- http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/blfs-dev FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/blfs/faq.html Unsubscribe: See the above information page
